Saturday, 31 March 2018

ALIBI, MINE by Rond-quinn DanforthFrig 20 Mai 2016 How To Save a White Australia?

ALIBI, MINE
by Rond-quinn Danforth
Frig 20 Mai 2016

How To Save a White Australia?
To Do: 
Ban ALP and Liberal parties and their traitorous allies – Greens, Nationals etc - from ever running for office again. 

Ban all foreigners from arriving as tourists or otherwise.

Return all so-called 'refugees' especially Africans

Import all the whites left in Africa.  Facilitate their rebuilding and renaissance here – cities like New Pretoria, New Cape Town, New Krugersdorf, etc. Build, breed, for your return in conquest. 

Allow free passage for all proven white Europeans and Americans. No mulattos – too many of them are here from Africa already.


Restore ownership of all Australia's ‘privatised’ State assets to white hands, now owned by the Chinese government – power, water, roads, ports, mines, etc. 

Ban all new building on the Coastal Fringe. All population growth is to restricted to a minimum of 500 miles inland from the Coast. Build the needed infrastructure using unwanted foreign offal who invaded our White Realm – Somalis, Turkoids, so-called Abos etc. 

End all debt-based financing. Buy what you can. Borrow nothing. Current banking system is ungodly and must cease. 

Our land, our People only. All others - hence! 
END



P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia phone 0448 187 582
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/ 

STORM 145 Februa-Mars 2016


STORM

No. 145              Public Information Bulletin of Australian National Action                   Februa-Mars 2016
ANA accept no responsibility for information provided/inferred. STORM is an information source only

STORM gets information from ‘insiders’, SCUTTLEBUTT. We can’t confirm stories. Here’s the latest:

South China Sea Pirates @24 12.14:
“I was in the Royal Australian Navy in 1984. We were on a submarine in the South China Sea. We surfaced one night only to be met by two speedboats proceeding very fast from a mother-ship. The captain called me up to the bridge. He said:  ‘get a spotlight up here!’ We shone it directly at them but they continued to approach, very fast. Then the captain turned to me: ‘use your SLR [FN/FAL]– put a few rounds across their bows’. I did but to no effect. Then we took more extreme action. People get killed in that area all the time; the Asians said nothing; nobody cared. They have bigger issues – like feeding their starving millions. Only our foolish media make a big deal about illegal immigrants”.

Post election Qld @20.1.2015: Soon after Campbell Newman’s LNP lost election to the ALP we got the following rumour:
“Campbell Newman bought a 570,000 acres of land in Far West Queensland, cheap. He then sold it to British Gas for Coal Seam Gas extraction. Queensland Crimes and Misconduct Commission tried to investigate but their chief was sacked. An LNP stooge took his place. The media said nothing. Will they now?”

Upgrade: Overheard @20.1.2015: Indian professional: "My wife and I love to travel. We’ve been to New Zealand once and Canada twice”
[Why only visit White countries but never the Third World? They’re always looking to ‘upgrade’ from their current location. Is the key to understanding refo’s. Are all about greed, not need. RE]


DVD REVIEW: Kako Se Magao Izbeci Rat: Bosni I & II (What you may have missed in the Bosnian Wars) 180 minutes TV documentary from Bosnian Serb TV Circa 1997. Subtitles but no captions of those interviewed. (Part Four; Part Three is on STORM 144).

PART THREE: In June 1995, Defense Secretary William Perry told US Congress: “we’re not taking sides in the BH war” but they were. The US military were secretly arming Croat and BH forces. U.S. Air Force drones flew from the secret Croat Air Base on the island of Brac. In May 1995 the Croatian Army attacked Serb-held Krajina, also known as UNSector West.  The Croats expelled all these Serb into BH territory. Croatia claimed only 1,000 died in the assault; Krajina’s Serbs say 5,000 were killed including several UN troops. US government made no official comment as they were deeply involved. 

It had begun the year before. In November 1994 US DefSec Perry had signed a contract between the Croatian government and four retired, US Army, four-star generals. These became ‘advisers’ to either the Croatian or BH government armies.  These ‘high-level mercenaries’ belonged to a company, MPRI (Military Professional Resources International).  They included Lt Gen Ed Soyster, former head of the Defence Intelligence Agency; Major-General Richard Griffith, deputy commander for NATO, Central Europe; and General Karl Vuono. 

LDO later wrote: “by allowing Croatia to attack this Safe Haven, UN Sector West(Krajina), the US had given a ‘green light’ to Bosnia’s Serbs to attack other ‘Safe Havens’ like Zepca and Srebrenica, also known as UN Sector North and UN Sector South. When the BH government-sponsored Muslim militia of Nasera Orica attacked the nearby Serb village of Visnjica from Srebrenica Safe Haven, this time the Bosnian Serbs felt free to counter-attack. Orica retreated from Srebrenica, with 1,000 of his troops, to the Tuzla SH. 

Serb troops easily took Srebrenica. They captured 2,500 of Orica’s men and held them as POW’s. They loaded 2,000 unarmed civilians unto trucks for transport elsewhere. Very soon the lies began: a Croat serving with the Bosnian Serb Army, when later captured by the BH (Muslim) Army told ICC interrogators: “I personally killed 1,200 men at Srebrenica”. How? Mass graves uncovered in the area only continued 200 bodies. 

An article appeared in the Wednesday 2 August 1995 London Times ‘Missing’ Enclave Troops Found’ alleging that troops supposedly murdered by the Bosnian Serb Army were now in Tuzla where they had rejoined Bosnian Herzegovina Army units there. The article said: “thousands of ‘missing’ Bosnian Muslim soldiers from Srebrenica, at the centre of reports of mass executions by Serbs, are now safe in the North East of Tuzla”. On 17 Juli 1995 a Washington Post article by John Pomfrett ‘Bosnian soldiers evade capture’ said: 
“4,000 Bosnian Army troops,  many in rags, some crazed by exhaustion or fear, trudged for five days through Serb-held territory from Srebrenica. They have re-joined the BH Army’s 2nd Corps in Tuzla. They reported Serbs had ‘ambushed and killed hundreds’ of their comrades along the way. Means that up to 2,000 of Srebrenica’s 10,000 BH Army defenders may be lost or killed in the woods”. 
US State Department have consistently claimed 8,000-10,000 Bosnian Muslims having been killed in Srebrenica itself but have never produced any evidence for this. 

In Krajina, a Serbian enclave in Croatia, on 1st August 1995 100,000 US-trained Croatian Army troops attacked Serb positions in UN Sector North and UN Sector South. Dubbed ‘Operation Storm’, it was an all-arms assault, involving tanks, planes and artillery. US military equipment was used to jam Serbian military communications, severing the defenders from their overall Command and Control in Krajina. U.S. Navy aircraft, flying from Aviano AFB in Italy openly attacked Serb sites, completely destroying radar facilities and Communication sites in Krajina. The US aided Croatia in the largest ethnic cleansing operation of the War to date, which saw  200,000 Serbs driven from Croatia. 

Retired US Gen Charles Boyd, deputy Commander of NATO, later boasted: “the US both planned and implemented Croatia’s Operation Storm”. New York Times reporter Roger Choen(J) later discovered MPRI’s General Vuono “met repeatedly with Croatian generals before Operation Storm. It was a direct copy of US tactics used in  against Iraq in 1990’s Operation Desert Storm, that is, lightning strikes on multiple fronts. 

Reporter Tim Judah quoted EU Human Rights and Refugee Commissioner Emma Bonino as stating “10,000Serbs are now ‘missing’ as a direct result of Operation Storm”. Their whereabouts unknown, it is believed many ended up in mass graves.  Three US State Department sources told New York Times reporter David Binder: “the “green light’ for Operation Storm came from Richard Holbrook who flew into Zagreb to inform Croatian President Tudjman personally. RH later admitted as much admits this in his biography To End A War

After Operation Storm the US vigorously blocked all UN and EU peace initiatives for Bosnia, whilst encouraging Muslim and Croat forces there to carry out ethnic cleansing of Serbs from West Bosnia. These combined attacks left 10,000 killed and forced 200,000 to flee as refugees. Was identical to Serb loses in Krajina. RH was proud of his role, even later admitting in To End A War: “I advised the Muslim-Croat hierarchy on which Serb cities to target”. In Summer-Fall 1995 Muslim and Croat forces were open in their aggression in Bosnia, with the U.S. Air Force acting as their ‘air force’ against any Serb towns or villages which tried to resist them. 

All the excuse the US needed for this aggression was yet another staged ‘incident’. This occurred on 25 August 1995, once again at the Markala Markets, Sarajevo so very conveniently nearby the hotels where the US and EU media were based. One paper refused to ‘take the bait’. A London Times article soon after headlined: "Serbs Not Guilty of Massacre: Experts Warn US Mortar Was Bosnian’. The article went on to detail how British and French observers believed the Moslems had fired the mortar at their own people. They were overruled by a US NATO official. Hours after, NATO forces began its rolling attacks on Serb positions across Bosnia. 
Bill Clinton saw a role for NATO in Bosnia as justifying continued US domination of Europe. NATO had become hostage to an American Power concept: keep Europe Down and America Up. It was not till 1996, one year later, when Bill Clinton forced Serbia to sign the unjust Dayton Peace Accords that Serbs were allowed to open the first of many mass graves in West Bosnia, near Mrkonjic Grad.

BOOK REVIEW: Autopsy for an empire: Seven leaders who built the Soviet regime by Dr General D. Volkogonov (NYC: Free Press, 1998)

P463: “Gorbachev’s paradox was that, having come to a firm decision, he dragged his feet over implementation”.  

P463:”In Nov. 1987 Gorbachev decided to quit Afghanistan but failed to inform Afghan President, Najibullah. On 1st April, 1988 the Soviet Politburo agreed to withdraw all 109,000 Soviet troops from Afghanistan by 15thFeb 1989. They began the withdrawal on 15 May 1989”. 

P.464: “On 24th Jan 1989 Soviet Foreign Minister Shevardnadze filed a report on his visit to Kabul: 
“we are leaving this country in a lamentable state. Its cities and villages are destroyed, the capital is starving, the economy is paralysed and hundreds of thousands have perished…”

P464: “Gorbachev replied: ’but we will not appear before the world in our underpants - or even without them! Defeat is not permissible”.  

P466: “After four years of Perestroika it was clear no radical breakthrough in the economy had occurred. Instead, stagnation continued even worse leading to universal shortages. Spiritual deconstruction began before material and organisational deconstruction. In 1988 13,000 CPSU members quit, 9,000 were workers. Of 20 million CPSU members this was not many but it was unprecedented”. 

P468: “This Leninist system Gorbachev wished to preserve was built on lies, secrecy, control of information and tight management both public and private consciousness. As soon as the general public learned the truth about the regime’s myths the foundations began to crack. The system was powerless against truth”. 

P477: "the 26th of April 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe, like the Afghan War, exacerbated the economic and political aspects of the crisis facing the Soviet Union”. 

P488-489: “The self-destruction of the Soviet system was determined by a number of factors: 1. The arms race in which the USSR, at fantastic cost, achieved parity with the USA but overstrained itself. 2. Economic stagnation had become a permanent feature exposing economy is extremely low efficiency. 
3. Bureaucratic ossification of society, and dogmatic meets residing in the public mind, turned individuals into one-dimensional beings. 4. The militaristic nature of the Soviet Union had contained nationalism but it was bound to break out. 5.Monopoly of a single, political power had become hand-brake on development.6. The system which ruled in the name of the ‘collective’ had deprived individuals of their rights and liberties. 7 The Afghan War dealt the System’s deathblow with the authorities unable to justify the high human and material losses toa sceptical and disgruntled public”.

p 489: “While overseas Gorbachev was deified, at home he was reviled”. 

P490: “Anatoly Chernyayev, Gorbachev's International Affairs Adviser, said: “it took years for us to realise this society could not be renewed; it was doomed and needed to be completely replaced”.
  
P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia phone 0448 187 582
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/




N&INS 6th Augustus 2015:

Nationalist and Inter-Nationalist News Service 
ANA accept no responsibility for information provided/inferred. N&INS is an information source only

BBC World Service 3am Frigasday 6th Augustus 2015 (Pt. II):

Source Irwin Steltzer of the Hudson Institute: “Barak Obama is pursuing a ‘war on coal’ according to the Republican-controlled US Congress. He wants 'renewable energy' within 20 years. China went  to Paris to demand 'market-based schemes'. But the US government is pushing for a Central Plan. Is bizarre. They've become Capitalist and we've become Socialist! China builds a new coal-fired power  plant each week. They plan no cuts to this for at least ten years. Obama is more concerned with his ‘legacy’ than the country. The Republican Party are split: half are 'climate change’ deniers. Obama hopes to ‘lock in’ any potential Republican President to his new International energy deal".  

Reporter Dave Lee: "Las Vegas has just held its annual DefCon for the world's hackers. Many are wanted criminals. All are 'off the grid'. They use only cash, pens and paper. At DefCon no E-data is exchanged. No bookings: all pay cash at the door. DefCon attracts many FBI, and other intel, agents plus a large computer industry and media contingent. Dubbed 'the world’s most dangerous hackers', these like to meet to have fun and exchange 'ideas'. e.g. the Chrysler car-hackers who were active in recent weeks.
They appeared on stage to wild cheering from the 100’s of assembled hack-tivists in the room. The group said: 'we  uncovered a glitch in Oct 2014 and informed Chrysler. We received no response so felt forced to act. We released the information to the general media but Chrysler then tried to suppress the information. That's when  'Charlie Miller' did the hack”. 

‘British Treasurer Marc Carney(J) has said: ‘there will be no interest rate rise till 2016’. 

Rep Karen Allen: ‘It has been confirmed the Boeing wing flap found on Reunion came from MH370'. 

Reporter Alistair Leithhead: “Zimbabwe's top lion researcher has opposed calls for a 'hunting ban' after death of Cecil the Lion. He had tracked Cecil for the past nine years but says 'hunting is our sole source of research funds. Without research there'll be no lion parks. That means a return to cattle ranching and a greater loss of habitat. Poaching poses a greater threat to these animals. There is no debate on the need for hunting within Zimbabwe”.  

Reporter Sami Awami: “Tanzania has lost 80,000 elephants to poachers in the past ten years alone. All their tusks were sent by air to Beijing. The Tanzanian government complains of 'lax airport security' ”.
P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia phone 0448 187 582
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/

STORM 144 Dec 2015 - Jan 2016


STORM
No. 144          Public Information Bulletin of Australian National Action        Decembis 2015- Janus 2016
ANA accept no responsibility for information provided/inferred. STORM is an information source only

STORM gets information from ‘insiders’, SCUTTLEBUTT. We can’t confirm stories. Here’s the latest:
Young White Female Mental Patient on a bus, overheard @27 11 2014:"My Dad doesn't live with us any more – we got rid of ‘im. My brother is the spit of Dad. He's really angry and aggressive. Mum says that my issues are really petty compared to hers. She’s getting counselling because of all of us. She’s getting better! Male mental patient: “my wife has paranoia and depression”.  

AUSTRALIAN –VIETNAMESE, Overheard @18.12. 2014: A Vietnamese student with a very broad Australian accent: “No, I’m not Chinese! You can always tell us from the Chinese by the way we talk. They talk in short bursts, staccato. We speak more flowingly, although I’m not allowed to say that. I got accused by a Chinese student of being ‘racist’.”
“Have you ever been to Vietnam?” “No, I can’t go as my Dad is opposed to the current regime. Our family came from South Vietnam”. Ignorant, white female: “Oh, I loved South Vietnam! I went there on holidays recently. We went both North and South. It was great”.

Just Family and Friends @20.12.2014:
A Sri Lankan Singala refugee showed us photos on his iPhone of a recent trip back home for his niece’s Buddhist ‘Bar Mitzvah’ Ccoming of Age ceremony].
Were so many people, it looked like a public park. We asked: “where is this event?” “That’s my sister-in-laws family home”.  “How many guests were there?” “It’s just family and friends  - only 700 people“.
[That’s why Asians are inundating our White lands. Their females breed; ours just mimic Miley Vyrus and other Chosen trash, Judas goats. RE]


EDITORIAL:  

DVD REVIEW: Kako Se Magao Izbeci Rat: Bosni I & II (What you may have missed in the Bosnian Wars) 180 minutes TV documentary from Bosnian Serb TV Circa 1997. Subtitles but no captions of those interviewed. (Part Four; Part Three is on STORM 143).

What were ‘UN Safe Zones or Havens”? It appears they were established purely to act as ‘triggers’ for US intervention. ‘Safe’? Not for Serbs. For example, in Bihac Safe Haven of its 30,000 resident Serbs over 29,000 were killed or expelled early in the war. According to UNHRC of the 29,398 Bihac Serbs only 1,000 remained by 1993. Gorazde Safe Haven, in SW BH, had 10,000 Serbs and 50,000 Moslems in 1992. By 1993 there were still 50,000 Muslims but no Serbs. All had been killed or expelled.

Despite being designated ‘Safe Havens’ these areas were never de-militarised. With arms flowing in from the US, Germany and Islamic sources these ostensibly neutral Safe Havens became in fact armed Muslim enclaves. Their resident militias began a coordinated series of attacks on the mostly-Serb areas surrounding them. They did this in the hope of provoking reprisals with which they could then blame on “Serb aggression’.  

On 5th Februa 1993 Markala Marketplace Sarajevo was bombed, yet again. 68 civilians were killed and 200 wounded.  As usual the BH government accused ‘the Serbs’. As usual, without any evidence, the Western media repeated the accusation. But this time The UN had a resolution ready, sponsored by the US, empowering NATO to bomb Serb targets. Madeleine Albright joined in the chorus calling for Serb blood. When asked if it were possible that, as the Serbs alleged, the BH government was responsible, she retorted in a CNN TV interview: “it is impossible to believe a government would do this to its own people, so…” Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole urged an immediate attack and even personally visited the Marketplace. 

However, General Charles Boyd, head of NATO Intelligence, announced: “the BH government did it to get NATO to bomb the Serbs”. General Sir Michael Rose, new UN Commander for Sarajevo, agreed.  As did LDO. He later admitted in his book Balkan Odyssey: “the trajectory of the mortar shell was only 1,100-2,000 metres away so it had to have been fired from within the BH government’s own perimeter. It could not have been  fired by the surrounding Serbs”. LDO duly reported this to UN HQ in New York but it was suppressed by his superiors there who said: “any hint of a BH government role in this would lead to the BH government boycotting all future peace talks”. 

The US did not push for immediate NATO retaliation, however. It held off till after it had forced Bosnian Croat forces to unite with the Muslims in a BH ’Federation’. Croat President Tudjman made this possible after he was secretly promised US military assistance in capturing the Serb-rebel held territory of Krajina, then yet another UN ‘Safe Haven’ but this time a Serb one. This attack took place one you after the last Markala Market massacre. As well as aid Tudjman was promised de facto control Bosnia’s Western Herzegovina region. 

Finally, two months after the massacre, the BH government was ready. They got NATO to bomb Serb positions around their Gorazde Safe Haven. US military advisers then helped the BH Army capture six Serb villages. Serb counter-attacks were denounced on US network TV as “unprovoked Serb aggression”. This lead to US President Clinton asking UN Secretary-General  Boutros Boutros-Ghali for a UN resolution authorising NATO air strikes on Serb positions. Some went ahead before General Sir Michael Rose ordered a halt, knowing the BH government had manipulated the UN. 

Rose later issued reports on the alleged Gorazde ‘attack’ which totally contradicted BH reports released at the time. E.g. Sir Michael found: “Instead of 700 killed and 1,300 wounded at Gorazde we found only 200 slightly injured. Instead of Gorazde Hospital being totally destroyed we found only one shell-hole in the roof. We flew over the city by helicopter, which US media reports said ‘had every house destroyed’. I agree, but they were not destroyed now but two years earlier when the BH government forces drove all Serbs out - 12, 500 people. Yes, every house is damaged but our forces can tell the difference between a house damage by ethnic cleansing and one damaged by random shellfire. A cleansed house is burned out. It has no roof, doors or windows. Its interior is sprayed with bullets. There is nothing left. But a shelled house still has people living in it. Two years ago policies were formulated and actions taken on totally false information” [igra brojeva]. 

So where were all the ‘missing’? 1992, the first year of the war was also its bloodiest. The BH government put total loses at 17,000 killed by December 1992 By Februa 1993, only two months later, their figures had mysteriously risen to 200,000 killed. How? It was winter; all fighting had ceased. George Kenny in a 1994 New YorkTimes article criticised the BH government’s use of ‘inflated casualty figures’. He said: “BH government sources provided these figures to all media and all media simply accepted them" e.g. John Burns of the New York Times, Carol Williams of the Los Angeles Times and John Pomfret of the Washington Post. By 1994 the US military had calculated only 60,000 killed in all Bosnia. 

The ICRC estimated only 20,000-35,000. But by now BH government figures stood at 300,000. Which was right? It all depends on who you want to believe. But since the War only 30,000 graves have been found. British MI6 accused the US’s CIA of ‘doctoring reports’. For example, the CIA told the US government that ‘90% of ethnic cleansing was done by Serbs’ yet UN figures show 40% of all refugees to be Serbs. How do we reconcile this? The CIA did not count Serbs as being ‘refugees.’ The CIA even stated:”no Serbs are refugees as all Serbs leave voluntarily’.  This fitted the neat US public view of Muslim as ‘victims’ and Serbs as ‘pure aggressors’. 

BH Foreign Minister Haris Siladzik also used highly inflated numbers, this time for the number of rapes during the War.  He alleged: “40,000 Bosnian women were held in Serb rape camps” This was quoted by Newsweek’s Alexandra Stiglmeyer(J) who later admitted she had “no evidence“ for her figures of “30,000-50,000 rape victims”. The EU agreed claiming: “20,000 rapes” but soon deleted this. A later UN report concluded that only 2,400 rapes were committed ‘by all sides’ in the War. By 1994, the BH war was one of false images, staged events and false numbers. All this was part of a US media campaign to prepare Western public opinion for direct NATO military intervention in the future. 

BOOK REVIEW: Autopsy for an empire: Seven leaders who built the Soviet regime by Dr General D. Volkogonov (NYC: Free Press, 1998)

P443: “Despite the failure of Lenin’s ideas and methods, Gorbachev’s attitude to him did not evolve. Right up to 1991, when the CPSU collapsed, Gorbachev repeated the mistake of Khrushchev who in 1956 knocked Stalin off his pedestal, only to return to Lenin. Some knew the problem was not Stalin but the System, the ideology and the Leninist architecture itself”.

P444: “Gorbachev said: ‘Communist dialectics will provide solutions’, undermining all his ideas for ‘perestroika’ ”.

P449: “Three key words used by Gorbachev were: ‘Uskorenie – Acceleration, Glastnost - Openness and Perstroika - Reconstruction”.

P453: “Gorbachev acted ad hoc. He had no one to learn from. His most striking weakness was indecisiveness. He was half-hearted in the measures he did take, leaving them incomplete. A duality emerged, caused by the unclear nature of the ‘liberal option’ and the tortuous shedding of Bolshevik stereotypes. Perestroika was an attempt to introduce change to a Socialist system by those still holding onto the old ideas”.

P452: “Gorbachev was presented with a choice of three different paths: Radical Reform, Liberal Development or Conservative Restoration. His three predecessors’ attempts at Conservative Restoration had brought the country to its present crisis. RadicalReform could only destroy the ‘Socialist foundations’. Political pluralism, a free-market and private ownership would end the Communist Party’s monopoly on power. Gorbachev chose the path of Liberal Development, attempting to preserve a Socialist economy that was ‘mixed’ as Yugoslavia and China had done”.

P456-457: “After 70 years of Bolshevik rule the masses had lost any sense of independent action beyond complaining about small abuses and supporting orders from above. Neither the CPSU not the Politburo or its Chair, the General Secretary, would state the obvious. Perestroika must transform the totalitarian, bureaucratic society into a democratic one. For the Communist Party this would be suicidal; it would never accept the idea”.

P458-459: “This made the climate for Perestroika extremely contradictory. The Party was adrift and ready to melt away. The country was also a drift. Gorbachev battled to create a ‘Socialist society with a Human Face’. One unintended consequence was to accelerate the process of self-destruction of the totalitarian system. Perestroika was an important transition to democracy”. 

P.459: “Regrettably, Gorbachev handed the job of ‘democratising  society’ to the CPSU, who were singly committed to ensuring Perestroika’s failure”.

P460: “All members of the Soviet Politburo had appeared in print. Their books lay unsold in bookshops. In a 1986 report head of the State Publishing Committee, M. Nenashev, told the Central Committee: ‘we still have millions of copies of Brezhnev’s 166 books  in stock as well as 700,000 portraits of Brezhnev, 130,000 portraits of Andropov and 70,000 portraits of Chernenko’. His report was marked ‘TOP SECRET: For Politburo Eyes Only’ ”.

P461: “Gorbachev failed to take into account the chief attributes of the Soviet system were inertia, stagnation and Conservatism.  Once Glastnost (‘openness’/truth telling’) and Perestroika began to erode these, the System would naturally fall apart”.

P462: “Gorbachev was the seventh leader of a State in which no democratic institutions had ever existed and where liberty was not the chief spiritual value”.

P462: “Between December 1979 and February 1989 over 546,155 Soviet troops served in Afghanistan, 13,826 dying as a result”.

P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia phone 0448 187 582
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/