Friday, 14 March 2014

STORM 126 (Mars 2014)

STORM
No. 126                     Public Information Bulletin of Australian National Action                     Mars 2014
ANA accept no responsibility for information provided/inferred. STORM is an information source only
STORM gets information from ‘insiders’, SCUTTLEBUTT. We can’t confirm their stories. The latest:

ASIAN-AUSTRALIANS: An Asian looking woman complained: “there are too many Asians coming to Australia!” We were puzzled. “But aren’t you from Asia?” “By way of Portugal!” she said, acting offended. Portugal? She’s from East Timor, so is racially-mixed. Portuguese rulers encouraged race-mixing between their white, black and yellow-skinned subjects from 1511 AD onwards. Difficult today to find a pure-race descendant of the Portuguese Empire. Just look at Brazil. Empire collapsed in 1974. Many Timorese, like this woman, migrated to Australia. Second-generation migrants think themselves ‘Aussies’, but no one else does.

WALLOON GYPSY: A 77 year-old man told us: “my name is German but I’m not German. I’m a Walloon. We’re Gypsies. That’s why we’re slightly browner than other Europeans. Most Walloons live in Belgium but many have spread throughout Europe. Our people are natural metal workers of tin, silver and gold”.

BOOK REVIEW: The Reporter and the Warlords by Craig Collie (Crow Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1989).
OBSCURE EX-PAT: The biography of W.H. ‘Don’ Donald, Australian journalist. After working at the Sydney Daily Telegraph and Melbourne Argus at age 28 Don in May 1903 became editor of Hong Kong'S China Mail. Don moved to China and never left, dying there in November 1946 aged 71 years at Shanghai’s Country Hospital.

‘AUSTRALIAN’S IMPACT ON ASIA’: This book was given us by a Malay-Chinese who said: ‘you should know the impact Australians have in Asia’. Intrigued, our first question was ‘why’s no one heard of Don?’ He left Australia in 1903 and never returned. He ‘fell in love’ with China and saw no reason to leave. Like most Western ‘advisers’ there, Don enjoyed a power and lifestyle he could only imagine in their home country. So what did Don achieve in 43 years as an expat?* He arrived eight years before the end of Manchu-rule in China. In 1911 China became a Republic, a democracy in name only. Without strong Central government power as exercised by the emperor’s since 1700BC, power devolved to the Empire’s regional governors.

FOREIGN ADVISERS TO CHINA: Don did his best to give good advice, first to the Manchu’s 1903-08 (pp.38-47) and then to Sun Yatsen’s rebel Republican forces 1908-11 (pp. 48-54ff). Suns’ rebels succeeded in 1911 at overthrowing foreign/Manchu rule. Don became adviser, first to Sun (pp.101-108) then in 1928, to Zhang Xueliang - ‘Young Marshal’, ‘warlord’ of Manchuria**. Zhang’s father, Zhang Zuolin, was Manchu regional governor and President of China in 1927 before being assassinated in the endless power struggles that paralysed China 1911-27. On his death the governorship devolved to his son, an example of Chinese ‘democracy’ in action.

WHY FOREIGN ADVISERS? The Chinese, as seen in 55 Days at Peking a Hollywood film, about the failed 1900 Boxer Rebellion, were assailed by a dozen European powers including the US and Japan. Occupied by foreign armies and bullied by their Ambassadors/Special Envoys each demanding their ‘piece’ of China. The besieged and weakening Manchus could not resist. But passive resistance was another thing. One thing the ‘foreign powers’ had in common was they all were jealous of each other. No one could annex or colonise China outright if opposed by others. One Chinese defence mechanism was to hire foreigners to advise them on how to deal with foreign governments, both others and their own. Don was one such ‘adviser’.

DUAL ROLE ‘ADVISERS’: The Manchus/Chinese showed their innate cunning. Many journalists – British, Australian, or American – were used by the M/C’s as paid or unpaid ‘advisers’. What did these gain from it? They not only got to cover a story from the inside with privileged access to sources, they got to make the news. Every egotistical news-hound dreams: ‘If only I ran the country’. Now they could: power without glory. In China foreign journalists got to formulate solutions. In this way the Chinese ‘played’ foreigners against each another.

OTHER ADVISERS: After working for the YM Don was hired by President of China, General Chiang Kai-shek. Don found the taciturn general difficult to get one with but Don worked very well with his wife, Mai-ling. Others advisers working for the Chinese were: American journalist George Bronson Rea, co-founder with Don of the Far Eastern Review. Dr George Morrison, reporter for The [London] Times; Rev George Shepherd, a NZ missionary; Ilona Sues, a Pole; American Captain Walter Stennes; German general Alexander von Falkenhausen; Anderson Roy, of the Standard –Vacuum Oil Co and  Earl Selles, an American journalist. The Chinese used of these foreigners to ‘curry favour’ with Western public opinion. Did Don and other ‘advisers’ have any real impact?

RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR: Don helped win the Russo-Japanese War for Japan. (p.26ff). How? Don was ‘Asian correspondent’ for various British newspapers. 1902-22 Britain and Japan had a formal military alliance. When the Russo-Japanese War began in 1904, British newspapers were jingoistic i.e. stridently pro-Japanese and virulently anti-Russian. The London Daily Express sent an urgent message to Don: ‘find Russia’s Baltic Fleet. Lost contact since left Red Sea’. There is a fine line these days between biased and unbiased reporting, a line the US media often cross. Another ‘line’ is between journalism and spying. Don crossed that line; his instrumental role in helping Britain’s ally, Japan, defeat the Russian Empire and so aided their rise to power in North Asia.

BRITAIN VERSUS RUSSIA: In the early stages of the 1904 War Russia’s Pacific Fleet was trapped by the Japanese at Port Arthur. This was a part of China the Japanese had captured in their 1894 War. In 1895 Japan was forced to surrender it to Russia by ‘The Western Powers’. Angered by this, Japan’s first move was to ally with Britain, one of the Western Powers, then used this alliance as the basis to wage war against Russia. Why would Britain ally with Japan? Is the same question asked earlier, in 1854, when the Crimean War took place and Britain was allied with Ottoman Turkey against Russia. In 1917 the British government refused entry to the Tsar’s family when they sought to flee the Bolsheviks, leading directly to their deaths.

BALANCE OF POWER: For hundreds of years Britain had opposed the domination of Europe by any one power. Lead to war with France for centuries, then after 1870 with a united Germany in 1914 and 1939. The British called this ‘maintaining the Balance of Power in Europe’. Europeans saw it as selfish meddling to permanently destabilise them. In 1949, when de Gaulle and Adenauer met to form the EU, they specifically barred Britain. Britain wasn’t allowed in till 1972. After 1941 the US took over this ‘balance’ role in Europe as Britain was now too weak. This explains the actions of the US/UK towards Serbia in 1999 and Russia in Eastern Europe since 1989 including the Ukraine today.

A SPY FOR JAPAN: Back to 1904. The Russian Navy’s Pacific Fleet needed ‘reinforcements’ to lift to blockade of Port Arthur. Isolated from all European aid through British pressure the Russians were forced to send their only other fleet, from the Black Sea. Don and the other British ‘media’ acted as spies for the British government, and for the Japanese, relaying to them all reports of Russian naval movements. As the Black Sea Fleet headed north along the Chinese coastline it had to pass Don’s home base, Hong Kong. Don was ordered to locate them, which he did (p. 31). His information allowed the Japanese to set a trap for the Black Sea Fleet, thus winning the war for Japan. Thanks to Don, Thousands of Russians died. Port Arthur surrendered.

BOLSTER FOR BOLSHEVIKS: As a direct result of Japan's victory Lenin and other Communists, sensing the Tsar’s ‘weakness’, staged the 1905 Insurrection. It failed but was a good ‘dry run’ for the later October 1917 Coup, the so-called Revolution. 1905 was an ‘unintended consequence’ of Britain ‘aiding an ally’. The 1905 revolt projected Lenin & Co into the limelight of the world’s media. The 1917 Coup lead to Germany’s defeat in 1945. How? By deposing the ineffectual Tsars and replacing them with totalitarian Stalinism. It was this which defeated the forces of A.Hitler at Moscow and Stalingrad. Don’s role in History was not always a happy one.

WEST CUTS AID TO MANCHUS: In 1908 Don got the Western Powers, i.e. Europeans, ‘on side’ with China’s Republicans, lead by Sun Yat-sen. Don personally drafted a letter, signed by local Republican leaders, guaranteeing the West’s representatives in Shanghai that their various colonial enclaves in China would be left ‘untouched’. After the ‘transition’ to non-Manchu rule, they were told, it would be ‘business as usual’ (pp.70-72). The Western Powers subsequently refused all requests for military aid from the Manchu government, dooming them. Unable to defend itself, the regime crumbled. Don became New York Herald ‘China correspondent’ allowing him to ‘sell’ Sun Yat-sen and the Republican cause directly to the US public (p.48).
 
SIAN INCIDENT: In 1936 Don brokered the historic Sian Agreement. This ended the Chinese Civil War which had raged since 1927 between China’s Nationalists and Communists. The agreement forced Nationalist President, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek, to ally with Mao Zedong’s Communist rebels. They stopped fighting each other and instead both fought the invading Japanese (p.230). *** Chiang never forgave either Don or the Young Marshal, believing both had cost him rule of China (P.313).

 *[‘Expatriate’ is a term for Australians who emigrate to other countries feeling Australia is ‘too small’ for them .Over 15% of our population now live overseas]. 

**[‘Warlord’ is a derogatory term used by Leftist/Western media to ‘pigeonhole’ the Chinese stopgap between monarchy and democracy. Similar events occurred in 1989 after Russia lost control of its empire in Eastern Europe. Armed groups battle each other; political fractions ally, fragment and re-ally. Is natural ‘shakeout’ when a totalitarian system dies].

***How did Don do it? In 4th Decembis 1936 Chiang was visiting Sian province on a routine ‘troop inspection’ tour when he was seized by Manchurian soldiers. In 1931 these had been ordered to flee their home province by Chiang rather than oppose the invading Japanese Army. Chiang thought China not yet ‘ready’ for a full-scale war with Japan. 

MANCHU PRIDE: He was right but the retreat of the entire Manchurian Army without a fight lead to them being ridiculed across China as ‘deserters’. Even today, history textbooks show them in a bad light. Angered at their ‘loss of face’ the Manchus demanded Chiang allow them to return to Manchuria to ‘fight the foreign invader’ i.e. Japan. Chiang was adamant he had made the right decision. He now threatened the Manchurians with harsh penalties. They felt they had no choice but to ‘arrest’ Chiang for their own protection. He attempted an escape and fell from a hotel window. Suffering bad injuries but denied medical attention, Chiang held out for two weeks, refusing to sign any ‘truce’. Neither side would budge so the Manchurians sent for Don. 

DON, THE DEAL-MAKER: Both sides asked him to negotiate for them. His strong anti-Japanese sentiments, possibly a result of his role in the Pt Arthur battle, lead him to urge a truce. Don inadvertently condemned China to becoming a Communist state after 1945. Chiang’s strategic view was correct, but in 1936 no one else agreed with it. Thanks to Don Chiang was forced to stop pursuing Mao and became his ally instead (p.243). With Japan’s defeat in 1945 the Chinese Civil War resumed. By now, however, Chiang’s forces had lost the ‘initiative’ to Mao’s Communist Armies.

TAIWAN ESCAPE: By 1949 the Civil War was over. Chiang’s defeated troops fled offshore, to Taiwan. Only the intervention of the US Fleet prevented their annihilation. After signing the Sian Agreement Chiang had the Young Marshal, Don’s protégé and commander of the unruly Manchurians, arrested. When Chiang fled to Taiwan he took the Young Marshal along. YM was still a prisoner in 1990, making him “the world’s longest serving political prisoner” (p. 313). Young Marshal outlived Chiang, dying in 2001 aged 100 years old.

BOOK REVIEW: Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy by Dr Colonel-general Dmitri Volkogonov (Moscow: Novosti/London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989).
 “On 14 April 1941 Churchill sent a report to Stalin. It alleged Germany was ‘redeploying large numbers of their Armed Forces to the East’. Stalin dismissed this as ‘yet another attempt by the English to provoke Russia into a war with Germany’. So on 14th June 1941 he ordered TASS to publish a Statement in Berlin ‘dismissing the rumour of German troop concentrations on the borders of the USSR as nonsense and clumsy propaganda by forces hostile to both Germany and the USSR’. This strange statement had a profoundly disorienting affect.  Read by millions of Soviet citizens and its entire armed forces, it was understood everywhere in the same way: ‘the government is not concerned. Neither should we be.’  People became convinced war was unlikely” (p.391).
“G.K. Zhukov was appointed Chief of the General Staff in February 1941. On the 15th May 1941, he urged Stalin to launch a preemptive strike on Germany as ‘Germany is now fully mobilized and able to surprise us with a sudden attack, I think it essential we forestall their forces during deployment by attacking them before they have time to be fully organized’. Five weeks before the battle, Zhukov was proposing the Soviet Union attack Germany” (p.398). [emphasis ours]

“In early March 1941 Chief of Military Intelligence, F.I. Golokov reported to Stalin: ‘the Wehrmacht has eight million men, 12 thousand tanks, 52 thousand guns and 20 thousand aircraft’ ” (p.399). 
“Zhukov later said: ‘Stalin resisted all attempts by the military leadership to put our troops on alert along the western border’(p.400) Stalin’s behavior was dictated by a realization of the consequences of a premature war.  He was deeply insecure. The USSR had faced the Capitalist world alone. Berlin concluded this had made the USSR ‘weak’. The Germans deduced caution had become indecisiveness. (p.401) They attacked the USSR at 4am, 22nd June 1941. (p.402). Stalin ordered Foreign Minister Molotov to phone the German embassy to ask: ‘why’? They replied: ‘Germany is forestalling an attack by the Russia’ (p.404). [emphasis ours]

P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia  phone 0448 187 582
Email: australiannationlaction@yahoo.com.au
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/

Wednesday, 12 March 2014

SNIPPETS# 26 Poland and Ukraine

SNIPPETS #26
SNIPPETS is published in the National Interest. No action should be implied or inferred. The opinions expressed remain those of the author entirely.
by Ixul Dante
BBC World Service 'Hard Talk' 740pm Wodensday 12th Mars 2014:
[Much bluster and rant from an eloquent English speaker. Is he really Polish or a US agent? RE] 
Amongst other things he spoke against: 
'Russia should beware of redrawing borders or it will end up like 1939 again. We are all watching Russia's treatment of minorities. We all know how that ended. Russia's actions in Ukraine are a threat to Poland's sovereignty. We have the total support of the international community ". 
MINORITIES: Yes, but few know how it began. Bromberg massacre, anyone? The Polish persecution of their German minority 1919-39 was an issue the League of Nations warned them about. It is what provoked A.Hitler's response. 
REDRAWN BORDERS: As for 'redrawing borders' maybe this Poles' German masters could explain their actions in Yugoslavia 1989-99 when it was their explicit support that lead to Croatia and Kosovo breaking away from the Federation. Hundreds of thousands of civilians were made refugees, thousands were killed due to US/German determination, supported by all of NATO. 
Maybe the Poles recall 1999 when they aided US aggression, the US air war on Serbia over separation of Kosovo? 
Redrawn borders is what made Poland what it is today. What about East Prussia, Silesia, Pomerania? How far do you wish to go with this? So much cant, hypocrisy and lies. 
THREATS TO SOVEREIGNTY: The US is dying, drowned under a sea of debt. $16 trillion they can never repay. Their solution is to destroy China and Russia before they 'go'. Just as they destroyed Iraq in 1991, Serbia in 1999 and Libya in 2011. All regional power centres must be neutralised. That's what is behind the Syrian war. Why? The dying, senile US political elite wish to secure a future for their bastard Staat in the Mittel Ost. 
THREAT TO PEACE: Poland, don't begin another World War! Don't be the tool of the International Elite, again.  

Monday, 10 March 2014

SNIPPETS#25 FUKUSHIMA RE-START

SNIPPETS #25 
SNIPPETS is published in the Public Interest. No actions should be inferred or implied. Opinions expressed remain those of the author entirely.
ABC TV 730 Report Channel 21 745pm Moonday 10th Mars 2014:
Reporter Matt Carney, Futaba, Japan: 
"The Abe government is planning to re-start all 48 nuclear power stations in Japan. They say Fukushima has recovered from the 11th March 2011 accident and is now 'safe'. The government aims to begin returning the first 30,000 residents to their homes. A Tepco [Tokyo Electricity and Power Co., owner of the Fukushima plant] whistleblower with 20 years experience say this is all wrong. 
He said: 
'the other day contaminated water leaked out [of the Fukushima plant] and into the Pacific Ocean. A warning alarm sounded but was ignored for nine hours. I was stunned. There are no more experienced managers. All have reached their radiation limits so have been removed from their posts. We now have only in-experienced staff so mistakes occur daily. We are supposed to remove the 5000,000 fuel rods but the technology does not yet exist. It can't be done'. 
Matt Carney:
'radiation levels around Futaba, near Fukushima, are still fifty times those of Tokyo. Three former Japanese Prime Minister's have jointly urged Prime Minister Abe not to re-start the nuclear plants. Prime Minister Abe says reliance on imported coal is endangering Japan's fragile economic recovery. All around Futaba we found workers are digging up the contaminated top soil and bagging it. They then pile these into 'mountains' awaiting removal. But there is nowhere to remove it to. No one knows what to do with it".   

Friday, 7 March 2014

SNIPPETS #24 SOCHI's Whites

SNIPPETS #24 
SNIPPETS is published in the National Interest. No action should be implied or inferred. The opinions expressed remain those of the author entirely.
by Ixul Dante 
ABCTV Channel Two Opening Ceremony Para-Olympics Sochi 330am Saturnsday 8th Mars 2014:
SOCHI: What a shock to see the beautiful smiling faces of hundreds of exclusively white dancers and performers at these Russian Winter Olympics. The women especially were almost angelic in appearance. So conditioned are we to the Sollywood world-view with its 'quota' of aliens in every shot, whether a TV news bulletin or a sit-com. A classic for this is the Power Rangers, a violent and mindless children TV show made by a Chosen firm. Its heroes belong to the 'five races': a blonde, a redhead, a black, a Chinese and an Indian. The plots are negligible. The point is to brainwash our youth. How refreshing to see the Rus have thrown off such nonsense.

LONDON: Such a contrast with the hideous affront to History at the 2014 London Summer Olympics. The difference? The sick, sad West is being strangled by the fake politically-correct 'equality' myth. The British tried to show their history, pre-Industrial villages and the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century, but were forced to make 20% of the actors either African or Indian. How foolish! No aliens were allowed to settle in Britain till 1948.

SLAVES NO MORE: The Russians are no longer slaves to such folly. This is why the alien-ruled West hate Putin. In 1991 the Soviet system died on its feet, worn out from 74 years of p.c. lies. Since Putin came to power in 1995 he has rescued the white Volk of Rus from the Enemy and their minions.

WAR TALK: This is the real reason the alien-ruled US and EU, lead by the deracinated 'british', now seek a war with the Rus. The Enemy alien currently resident in the White…err…Black House wants to turn the world into another Detroit, but on a massive scale.

SOCIALIST DIEHARDS: These diseased socialists cannot accept their myths - equality, fraternity, liberate - pursued since 1789 have been a ruin and a waste. How many millions have died in their wars? The US civil war 'o free the Africans' cost  600,000 white lives;  the first World War 60 million* and the Second thirty million white lives**? Why were WWI & II fought? To keep us all in chains to Wall Street and the City of London. It is these who bankroll the Reds, their alleged opponents.

REVANCHISTS: The Reds, dethroned in Rus by Putin's forces, seek revenge. They now rule the UK and US, France and Germany. Their one goal is to destroy Putin for stopping them from looting his homeland. Their method will be to attack him from the outside just as another liberator was assailed from without after 1933 when he mistakenly allowed his chief foes to emigrate.

NO PITY, NO MERCY: Dear Brother Putin, do not repeat his error! Show "no pity nor mercy"*** as their own Scriptures abjure you. Only you can save the West and the world's whites from the hideous gargoyles who seek our END.

*Ten million died in combat. The Spanish Flu, created in the trenches followed the returning troops home, killing fifty million of their kinfolk. UN's WHO finally admitted this in 2004 during the H1N1 'Swine Flu' epidemic. 

**Twenty million Russians died from Stalin's incorrect 'mass wave' battle tactics. 10.5 million Germans were killed during and after the War. 1.5 million from US/UK aerial bombing alone. 

*** Deuteronomy 7v2-5. 

Sunday, 2 March 2014

SNIPPETS #23 Ukraine Coup - the Response

SNIPPETS #23 
SNIPPETS is published in the National Interest. No action should be implied or inferred. The opinions expressed remain those of the author entirely.
by Benn Yogarni 
PoliticKing with Larry King on Russia TV c/- Briz 31 TV 130pm Solday 2 Mars 2014: [repeat of Wodensday 26th Februa 2014 programme]. 
"Kiev: Interior Ministry reports police authorised to use live rounds if attacked. Police report roof top sniping onto their position using live rounds. Parliament orders police to NOT fire and to withdraw from Independence Square". 
We are by now familiar with this pattern of events. We've seen it over and over since Februa 2011: in Egypt, Yemen, Libya and Syria. Allegedly unarmed protesters are shot. Turns out the rebels use live rounds against their OWN side then blame police. US & EU Human Rights groups use these false allegations to accuse these governments of 'abuses', then demand 'UN intervention'. The whole mess begins again. Someone needs to tell the EU's Kath Ashdown(J) and UN HR Chief Navi Pillay that Kyiv is NOT Libya or Damascus. They cannot disguising their use of Special Ops in the middle of a Central European democracy. Not without the active connivance of the controlled media, that is. 

So what really happened in Kyiv/Kiev on the night of Thorsday 20 Februa 2014? Hear what four BBC reporters said from the scene. Their reports were received in Brisbane, 5am Frigas 21st Februa 2014. 

Reporter Duncan Crawford: "There's been four hours of talks between the Polish, French, German and Ukrainian Foreign Ministers. Threats of sanctions are coming from Brussels. There has been three hours of fighting in Kyiv's Independence Square. Police have been forced back by demonstrators all the way to the government buildings".

Reporter Gabriel Gatehouse: "21 demonstrators have been killed in Kyiv today, 67 since last Tuisday [18th Febura 2014]. Stun grenades and Kalashnikov fire can be heard. I saw Opposition forces firing from high rise buildings. The demonstrators have captured many police and Interior Ministry troops. All the demonstrators were proudly showing off their firearms. Some were friendly, others were not. There are different factions…These are fighters NOT demonstrators. I saw the bodies of eight people who were killed today. They were being paraded around by Cossacks. We heard shots being fired back and forth across the Square".     

Reporter Jaime Kumarusami: "I saw the bodies of eight demonstrators, all from West Ukraine. All had been shot in the head or the heart by snipers [or at close range - by their own side. RE]. Demonstrators told us: 'we want the US to intervene militarily' ". 

Reporter Steve Rosenberg: "Armed demonstrators are in our hotel, looking for snipers. Both sides blame the other for the bloodshed. The demonstrators attacked the police. There was a sudden explosion of violence. The EU is demanding the Ukrainian President accept a 'roadmap' for change" [just as the EU/US demand of Syria's President Assad. RE]. 

Reporter Matt Price, Brussels: "Kathryn Ashdown says she holds the Ukrainian President responsible for all acts of violence including those by the anti-government demonstrators".

5am BBC World Service News Tuisday 25th Februa 2014:
Reporter Duncan Crawford, Kyiv:
"Ukraine's Interim Prime Minister says he wants the country to join the EU. Russian Prime Minister Medvedev has recalled its Ambassador to Kyiv calling recent events 'an armed mutiny'. He said: 'the West may call this a legitimate government. It is not'. Kathryn Ashdown has arrived in Kyiv to discuss a finance deal". 
Reporter Daniel Samford(J):
"Barack Obama has told Russia 'not to intervene' in the Ukraine. The former Ukrainian President was last seen in Crimea. He attempted to fly out of the country but was prevented from leaving by Ukrainian border guards". 
BBC World Service News 5am Wodensday 26th Februa 2014:
Reporter David Stern(J):
"Ukraine's Ambassador to Britain says the former President must be sent to the ICC to 'face charges for the murder of unarmed demonstrators'. He said: 'any attempt at separatism in East Ukraine must be severely punished, especially in Crimea'. An aide to the missing former Ukrainian President has been shot and wounded". 
BBC World Service News 2am Frigasday 28th Februa 2014:
"The new Ukrainian Finance Minister says the former President 'stripped the country of billions'. He has asked the IMF for financial aid".  
BBC World Service News 4am Satuyrnsday 1st Mars 2014:
Eugene Rumour(?) director of Eurasia at the Carnegie Institute and former intelligence officer for the National Intelligence Council(?):
"There will be penalties for Russia if they interfere in the Ukraine. Their positions on Iran and Syria will be threatened. They will lose all their status, internationally(?)"

Saturday, 1 March 2014

SNIPPETS # 22 Saudi Foreign Minister's Bro leads terrorists in Syria

SNIPPETS #22 
SNIPPETS is published in the National Interest. No actions should be inferred or implied. The opinions expressed are those of the author entirely. 
Islamic State of Iraq and Levant led by Prince Abdul Rahman
VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 4 FEBRUARY 2014  
"According to an interview broadcast by the Saudi-owned Al-Arabiya news channel, prince Abdul Rahman al-Faisal is the ruler of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Prince Abdul Rahman al-Faisal, a graduate of Sandhurst military academy, is the brother of Foreign Affairs Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, and of Prince Turki al-Faisal, Saudi Ambassador to the United-States and the United-Kingdom. 
ISIS is the Al-Qaeda branch in Iraq and Syria. It figures on the UN list of terrorist organizations. It Is funded by the United-States, by virtue of a law adopted for fiscal year 2014 during a Congress session behind closed doors [1]. It benefited of a logistical support from Turkey inside Syria. Ayman al-Zawahiri reacted to this revelation by saying that he would peel off the Al-Qaeda label from the ISIS (a decision made after the legal funding by the US)".
Translation 
Alizée Ville  [1] « Les États-Unis, premiers financiers mondiaux du terrorisme », by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network, February 3rd 2014.

COMMENT by Jegar Sadah-Uthur: Since 9-11 2001 one question has gone unanswered. Why attack Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003) when 15 of the 19 attackers were from neither of those two places but from Saudi Arabia, as was Osama bin Laden?

The US and Western media are tightly controlled by Kapital so cannot ask this. We can. Now we seem to be getting a clear picture. The US oligarchs owe their wealth to Saudi autocrats. For both the mass of their populations are just a nuisance.

One controls them by shepherding them into debt then keeping them there, lulled into dullness by 24/7 sports and gameshows, lotteries and sex parades.

The other sends its surplus off to fight 'infidels' abroad so they don't look too closely to moral turpitude at home. ObL was expelled from SA in 1995 for saying just that: 'why did the monarchy import Crusaders to defend the Holy Places (Mecca and Medina)?' in 1991. It was then he became an Enemy of both the US and SA.

So what is happening in Syria? Like Egypt it suffers from being neighbour to an Alien infestation. This growth feeds off the US whilst sucking its vitality and intellect. The US is hated world-wide due to this symbiotic relationship but its controlled media don't let the dullard public know this. Hence Geo W Bush stating: 'they hate us for our prosperity'. Oh?

America is broke. Since 2011 they have sub-contracted their wars to 'allies'. The French and British bombed and laid waste the wealthy Libyans. The French fight in Mali and CAR. Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia fight in Syria against Lebanese allies and Iranian secret units. The aforementioned 'surplus', the faithful cannon-fodder, are coming from Pakistani, Saudi and Iraqi prisons according to Volatire Network. As during the Afghanistan war, the autocrats are 'clearing' their gaols of troublemakers. 

STORM ALERT #48 : 'our boys on the Syrian front!'

STORM ALERT #48     
 1st Mars 2014
STORM ALERT is published in the Public Interest. No action should be implied or inferred. Opinions expressed are entirely those of the author only.
‘OUR BOYS ON THE SYRIAN FRONT…’ 
By Arad Radezske 
BBC World Service News 4am Saturnsday 1st Mars 2014:    Reporter Sebastian Usher:
 “3,000 rebel fighters have been killed by rival factions in Syria in the past two months. Al Qaeda recognises the Al Nusra Front but not the ISIL, Islamic State for Iraq and the Levant. ISIL has been forced to retreat to its home-base of Raka(?) in Syria”.  
What is going on in Syria? Simple question but a complex answer made more difficult by biased reporting and half-truths by Western Intelligence agencies. So here goes with a potted history.

BACKGROUND: In 1994 a US NeoCon [a post-Cold War Trotskyite fraction, neither Neo- nor Conservative] group wrote a Manifesto that promised to ensure US rule for the next 100 years. One key phrase was ‘to set the Middle East ablaze’. The Neo-Conmen presented this to US President Bill Clinton. Bill, a wily lawyer from Arkansas, swiftly rejected The Plan. Soon after his numerous sexual ‘affairs’ began to leak into the media. Bill was eventually impeached. The NC’s next approached Israili Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. He also rejected it. Soon after Bibi lost power to his Labour Party rivals. In 2000 Geo W. Bush became US President. When approached by the NC’s he endorsed their Plan unreservedly. Soon after 9-11 occurred. The rest is History or Their-story. Geo.W Bush served eight years as President and retired a very rich man.

A PREVIOUS PLAN, in 1917: The Neo-Conmen planned to ‘re-write the map of the Middle East and North Africa’. ‘Re-write’? They believe the original break-up of the Turks’ Ottoman Empire was muffed. After nearly 100 years the Neo-Conmen saw it was ready for a ‘reboot’. Hence their new Plan.
Capt TE Lawrence was a WW1 British Intelligence officer based in Saudi Arabia. Believing he had single-handedly defeated the Turks with his Bedouin allies TE formulated a ‘plan’ for the post-war treatment of the Ottoman Empire, a massive landmass stretching from North Africa to the Balkans to Russia. Lawrence sought a large Pan-Arab-staat with its capital in Damascus.[see where Syria fits? RE]

VERSAILLES FAILURE: TE pursued his goal at the 1919 Versailles Treaty Conference which ambitiously set out to re-write all the borders of those defeated in 1919, including the Ottomans. This conflicted with someone else who had a plan for a quasi-European colony in Palestine. TE left Versailles unhappy and later died in an ‘accident’. He was not alone. The errors at Versailles directly lead to the rise of A.Hitler in Germany and B.Mussolini in Italy. Both were angered by perceived mistreatment of their countries at Versailles. Is why many say ‘WWII began in 1919’. At Versailles it was revealed that a France and Britain had signed a secret treaty, also in 1917, to divide the former Ottoman Empire between them into 22 countries. Those states remain today, a product of the 1917 whims of the British and French Empires, now both since crumbled. Much conflict and many lives were lost following the 1919 ‘carve up’. So we could see the NeoCons attempts to redress of a historical ‘error’ as praise-worthy, but…most nowadays are wary of such do-gooders.

NEW PLAYER: In 1948 a new player was added. This was the result of another secret 1917 ‘treaty’ whereby Britain would establish a ‘colony’ in Palestine in return for desperately needed wartime loans. Called the Balfour Declaration it was not exposed till 1927 when it provoked widespread unrest in Arab-majority Palestine. This lead to the many deaths. The British expelled the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem to Germany. There he came under the sway of one A.Hitler. Grand Mufti was grandfather of Yassir Arafat who became PLO chief in 1967. Britain allowed this colony to be created but only the US could guarantee its survival. They did this through six major wars and its numerous punitive raids on neighbouring states. By 1994 the US was weary of the endless struggle. So was the colony. Its major minds decided on a bold course of action. It planned to ‘re-assemble’ its troublesome region into a more manageable lineup. They wrote The Plan. The most powerful of former satrap was to go first.

IRAQ: In 1991 a loyal CIA operative, Saddam Hussein, was ruler of Iraq. He had joined the CIA in 1961 whilst in Egypt. He was there following a failed assassination attempt on Iraq’s then anti-Western strongman. In 1979, with CIA help, Saddam became Iraq’s strong man. In 1980, on US orders Saddam attacked Iran. A limited offensive it was not meant to conquer Iran but to punish the Ayatollahs for the 1979 of toppling long-term US regional puppet, the Iran’s Shah (Emperor). The Shah had, thanks to lucrative US defence contracts, the strongest Armed Forces in the region. A staunch anti-Communist, he had attempted to ‘modernise’ his autocracy whilst retaining absolute power – sound familiar? Saudi and other Gulf State US allies are attempting this task right now. As in 1979 US ‘advisers’ will be telling the sheiks ‘it is feasible’ whilst keeping their own bags packed. No doubt folk told France’s King Louis XIV similar things in 1789. Some modernisers say: ‘look at the British royal family!’ A constitutional monarchy, true, but in a country that has suffered SIX civil wars. Iraq was defanged in 1990-91 but not conquered or re-moulded. That took place after the Second Iraq War/US invasion in 2003. That task was generally completed by 2011. It was then safe to begin the next Stage of The Plan, the Arab Spring. Named after the Czech Spring of 1968 this was a Western plot to topple Soviet rule in Central Europe. An operation of the US’s CIA it failed but US media made much of the resultant Soviet oppression.

HUMAN RIGHTS AS A WEAPON: This let to ‘human rights’ becoming a weapon for the first time in History with which to beat up on one’s factional opponents. US-sponsored groups arose across Eastern Europe leading to more oppression and the 1977 Helsinki Accord whereby the US could scold the Soviets for ‘human rights’ abuses whenever they felt fit, imposing UN sanctions, etc. Use of HR by the European Union and US continues today. The latest is the issue of ‘gay rights’ in Russia and the Third World, especially Africa. Use of HR attacks contributed to the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Empire. How? US creates a provocation. Soviets respond. Instantly, US media proclaim it ‘a HR issue’. Same trick was used in the Arab Spring to justify toppling of M. Qadafi in 2011, Egypt’s Mubarak in 2011 and Yemen’s President in 2013. All these are former Ottoman satraps.

ANCIENT HISTORY PAID BACK: Another issue that arose, but the US media ignore, is ancient History. A certain group that rule in the Mid.East colony and key areas of the US were once slaves in both Iraq and Egypt. When? In 605 BC and 1250 BC, respectively. What?! YES. We’re dealing with major ‘payback’ here by a group whom atheist Karl Marx said: ‘their collective will constitutes the Will of GOD’. You wonder now at their control of the US economy and their ‘end goals’? The death of all others through incessant wars. The victor? Them. US is their latest ally/victim. USSR was their tool 1917-91. It threw them off so it then became a target. Is why US, their current tool, attacks Putin at every chance. When will their rule end? One of their key groups in the US today boasted: ‘at out annual bash we can guarantee 2/3 of the US Congress will attend’ whether willingly or not is unclear.

UKRAINE IN CONTEXT: When 2/3's of a country’s Parliament are hostages to an Alien Enemy entity it is time for a mass rescue or mass self-destruction. Given drug policy and sex addiction rates in the US it appears they are pursuing the latter goal. Who will be their next ‘host’? some say China or even Russia, again, if Putin can be deposed. It could be why the US/EU bloc engineered this Ukraine coup. Provokes Russia so US can then blame them. The old Cold war ‘provocation’ trick still works!
P O Box 635 Strathpine PS 4500 Australia phone 0448 187 582 Email:australiannationalaction@yahoo.com.au
australiannationalaction2.blogspot.com.au/